search

uutils / findutils

Rust implementation of findutils
MIT License
314 stars 38 forks source link

ci: Update bfs to 4.0 #446

Closed tavianator closed 3 months ago

tavianator commented 3 months ago

And fix diff-bfs.sh for the new test result format.

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 66.47%. Comparing base (d9d2a4e) to head (bcaea4f). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #446 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 66.47% 66.47% ======================================= Files 35 35 Lines 4278 4278 Branches 958 958 ======================================= Hits 2844 2844 Misses 1041 1041 Partials 393 393 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Commit 0492e01a20f6fba539e43b80c82985f7fa630c0b has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test  57 / 288 is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed:  70 / 317.  70 / 317 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70
github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Commit bcaea4f42cc8eb6a8e02c2a9824303b37a139739 has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop. gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70
sylvestre commented 3 months ago

Thanks