Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
This feature request is essentially adding a priority tag to category. But how
is it different from filtering by category?
When you are studying, should AnyMemo give you all the card in that top
priority category first? In that sense, the use case is very similar to
category filtering.
Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2014 at 6:47
The workflow you describe is not really practical when your reviews only
include a few cards from each category. It's not worth the effort of iterating
through your categories manually.
In any case, I think the priority field would work better on individual cards.
For example, it is much more important that I remember the French word for
"hello" and "how much?" than "socks" or "incorrigible".
You could also create quizzes based on priority. It would be very useful to do
a quiz of only the most important cards in my entire deck.
Original comment by rogerkea...@gmail.com
on 23 Mar 2014 at 6:31
Does "multiple category" in issue 104 work?
You can set a category named "Priortized" and give this category to other
categories.
Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2014 at 5:45
I've used categories before for priorities in both Mnemosyne and Anki and found
it to be impractical. Priority has special semantics that categories do not.
Apart from that, compare the programming cost of adding a single column for
priorities vs using a join table to support multiple categories - and then
assigning semantics to those categories.
Original comment by rogerkea...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2014 at 3:12
I do agree the developing multiple category is way more difficult, especially
considering the need to maintain compatibility of the db format. However,
currently AnyMemo, as of 10.4, has suffered from too many little features that
probably very few people are using. A lot of feedback of new users are AnyMemo
has too many settings and menu items and is hard to use. From 10.5 and onward,
I would like to provide solution by extending / combining current feature
without introducing any configuration / settings to meet the need of most
people. The goal is to make AnyMemo easy to use for new user while still meet
the need of most old users.
For category priority, I feel it could be another little feature like font
customization, paint and DB default settings, audio recording that only very
few people are using. But I am open to discussion on this issue.
Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2014 at 5:58
Yeh, Anymemo has some feature creep going on. Although, really the problem is
with the UI more than the actual features.
Original comment by rogerkea...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2014 at 6:54
Well, it is hard to change the UI and keep the same set of feature set.
I looked at lots of 5 million+ download education apps' UI (Duolingo, Learn
Korean, Rosetta, How to draw and etc) , things in common are:
1. Emphasis core feature set.
2. Almost no configuration and customization needed.
I am currently working on usage analytics integration so I can know what
feature the users are using and what are not and I will decide what needs to be
enhanced and what needs to be dropped.
Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2014 at 8:33
How is the "Move card to another database" feature progressing? I might be able
to use that feature to split my cards into separate decks based on priority.
Original comment by rogerkea...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2014 at 6:49
For moving card between database between dbs, please comment on issue 246. The
issue 246 is not designed correctly yet. I am not exactly sure how can make the
card moving simple. (IMO, I prefer supporting copying / pasting across dbs and
share card to other dbs, this enhance the current functions without adding any
new UI)
Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com
on 21 Apr 2014 at 7:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rogerkea...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2014 at 3:14