Open bpurinton opened 5 months ago
OK, fine for now with other priorities.
The motivation here is to see the interest points on each of the original images (to check distribution), and then to assess the subset of those interest points was successfully matched (and distribution). If we only have the match points, and there are issues with match point number and distribution, we don't know if the issue was due to poor matches, or the fact that there were no interest points to begin with in a particular area of the input images (e.g., due to limited texture, clouds, water).
Matches are more important, and when things work well, that's all we need. It's the cases that fail where we want to check the original ip.
Good points, I think it will be a nice feature to have, but as you said, other priorities first (i.e. going to start working on the ICESat plotting soon)
Not sure this is needed. There is already functionality to plot the
.match
files, and the ASP docs note:So the
.vwip
interest points are the original raw interest points on each image that are filtered down to the single.match
points file of the interest points found in both image.There might not be a strong use case at the moment of implementing
vwip
plotting functionality.If we do want it, then port the functionality from: https://github.com/friedrichknuth/bare/blob/3e610858be44418fcf334d760e853ce7868be16d/bare/plot/plot.py#L189