Closed ekfriis closed 12 years ago
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292.
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292.— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785392).
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
/ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
/ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415.
ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415.
Hi Austin,
Have you had a chance to look at these yet?
Evan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote:
ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292>.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415>.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7812902.
Ah, okay. I did not realize these were complete. I'll check them.
-Austin
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Have you had a chance to look at these yet?
Evan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
D. Austin Belknap
University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch
I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.
-Austin
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Have you had a chance to look at these yet?
Evan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
D. Austin Belknap
University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch
fine, so I think we can proceed with the 53x
as
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.
-Austin
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Have you had a chance to look at these yet?
Evan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
D. Austin Belknap
University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch
how do we proceed ? I need a set of dataset names that I can submit.
-Tapas
On Aug 27, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
fine, so I think we can proceed with the 53x
as
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.
-Austin
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Have you had a chance to look at these yet?
Evan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,
/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/
On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:
submitted using 5_3_3.
-Tapas
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Here they are:
/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Austin,
Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?
Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:
Hi,
How about the following samples?
ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
-Austin
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Josh, Austin,
Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.
Evan
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:
Evan,
One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.
-T
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:
Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:
I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
D. Austin Belknap
University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.chmailto:d.austin.belknap@cern.ch
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-8060892.
Josh has successfully cross checked with it in H2Tau group. Closing.
First step - how do we decide it's good?