Validate 53X PAT tuple - Githubissues

uwcms / FinalStateAnalysis

An analysis framework for the Compact Muon Solenoid

3 stars 43 forks source link

Validate 53X PAT tuple #4

Closed ekfriis closed 12 years ago

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

First step - how do we decide it's good?

tsarangi commented 12 years ago

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

tsarangi commented 12 years ago

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785392).

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6
ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
/ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM
/ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

tsarangi commented 12 years ago

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415.

tsarangi commented 12 years ago

ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Hi Austin,

Have you had a chance to look at these yet?

Evan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote:

ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292>.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415>.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7812902.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Ah, okay. I did not realize these were complete. I'll check them.

-Austin

On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Have you had a chance to look at these yet?

Evan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

D. Austin Belknap

University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.

-Austin

On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Have you had a chance to look at these yet?

Evan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

D. Austin Belknap

University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

fine, so I think we can proceed with the 53x

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.

-Austin

On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Have you had a chance to look at these yet?

Evan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

D. Austin Belknap

University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.ch

tsarangi commented 12 years ago

how do we proceed ? I need a set of dataset names that I can submit.

-Tapas

On Aug 27, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

fine, so I think we can proceed with the 53x

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

I just calculated efficiencies with the new samples, and they check out with what I was getting before. So, they look fine to me.

-Austin

On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Have you had a chance to look at these yet?

Evan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, tsarangi notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: ALL DONE. Output files are here,

/hdfs/store/user/tapas/2012-08-16-8TeV-PatTuple/

On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Tapas Sarangi wrote:

submitted using 5_3_3.

-Tapas

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Here they are:

/ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM /ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v1/AODSIM

On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Austin,

Can you send Tapas the full dataset names?

Evan On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Donald Austin Belknap wrote:

Hi,

How about the following samples?

ZZTo4mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo4e_8TeV-powheg-pythia6 ZZTo2e2mu_8TeV-powheg-pythia6

-Austin

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Josh, Austin,

Can you give Tapas a good MC sample for producing a test 53X PAT tuple. Preferably one that has a 52X equivalent. Josh, maybe one of the x-check samples would be good.

Evan

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM, tsarangi wrote:

Evan,

One thing to make sure that the sample(s) we are testing with 53x also exist in 52x. Just not to rerun. It will be better to have a sample where one can check all the components such electrons, muons, jets and missing-ET.

-T

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Evan K. Friis wrote:

Hi Tapas, that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps we can ask Austin & Josh each for a preferred MC sample and they can compare?

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, tsarangi wrote:

I can test a couple of datasets, one from MC, other from data, compare with the same from 52x ?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785249).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7785292. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-7787415. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

D. Austin Belknap

University of Wisconsin - Madison d.austin.belknap@cern.chmailto:d.austin.belknap@cern.ch

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwcms/FinalStateAnalysis/issues/4#issuecomment-8060892.

ekfriis commented 12 years ago

Josh has successfully cross checked with it in H2Tau group. Closing.