Closed tmpfs closed 3 years ago
Hey @tmpfs I like build
because it is short, memorable and seems most relevant to what it covers.
If anything I see webpack
more as the tool
and the integration as more the pipeline
of the build
... if that makes sense?
Thanks @chrism std::build
it is then! Will do that tomorrow and then the integrations renaming should be complete!
Closing as implemented, I went for a top-level build
rather than the std::build
namespace as these plugins are not part of the standard library.
Tested using this:
uwe new webpack-project build::webpack
cd webpack-project
npm install
uwe dev --exec
Update the example code in
docs/in-depth/build-tools
.@chrism, I recently converted the build tool examples into blueprint plugins using the
std::integration
namespace so that people can do stuff like:Because we have just removed the use of integrations in this context I think we should rename the plugin namespace.
Maybe
std::build-tool
,std::build
or juststd::tool
instead? Or should we put them in thestd::blueprint
namespace?They don't live in the blueprints repository and I am not treating them as officially supported so my preference is to avoid the
std::blueprint
namespace and use one of the other suggestions.Got a preference for the new namespace?