search

uwlib-cams / MARC2RDA

mapping between MARC21 and RDA-RDF
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
36 stars 3 forks source link

250 edition statement #118

Open CECSpecialistI opened 3 years ago

CECSpecialistI commented 3 years ago

https://github.com/uwlib-cams/MARC2RDA/blob/main/Working%20Documents/2XX.csv

CECSpecialistI commented 3 months ago

@AdamSchiff this field has $7 for data provenance. Do we need to map it, or has it not been implemented yet?

lake44me commented 3 months ago

Please note - before this mapping is ready for transform, the rows that get Rreproduction Conditions checked need to have that information added. Let @dchen077 know when the mappings are otherwise reviewed/approved so she can add the condition information.

dchen077 commented 2 months ago

@AdamSchiff Hi Adam, I was wondering if I could get a clarification on whether we should be mapping $7 data provenance? Or is it okay to continue with the mapping review since this subfield wasn't added to any of our spreadsheet? Thank you!

AdamSchiff commented 2 months ago

$7 has been implemented in OCLC, so there may be a few (very few I suspect) bib records that contain it somewhere. It would be nice to know if any of our records in Alma have the subfield, or if any records in LC's database have them. The number may be so small that it might not be worth all of the effort to match it to every possible RDA element.

image

dchen077 commented 2 months ago

Thank you Adam! @CECSpecialistI Crystal, would it be possible for me to access either Alma or LC database to check for examples? Or would it be better for me to email you to request some? Thank you!

junghaelee commented 2 months ago

@CECSpecialistI @dchen077 I can provide some examples from Alma, probably later today or tomorrow.

junghaelee commented 2 months ago

Well, I ran the Alma indication rule yesterday and the progress is only 32%, so it won't finish anytime soon.

dchen077 commented 2 months ago

Okay, thanks for letting me know.

CECSpecialistI commented 2 months ago

I have a big set of example records that just finished processing that I'm about to put in the Drive if I can, with over 7 million records in it for Ying-Hsiang's aggregates code. There should be many 250 edition statement examples there if you want to fish for them?

CECSpecialistI commented 2 months ago

Sorry I missed the context. $7 for data provenance, not 250 edition statement! My bad.

junghaelee commented 2 months ago

The initial search did not yield any results: no records were found with $7 in fields 210, 240, 245, 246, 247, 510, 515, 518, 650, 651, 653, 655, 710, and 711. The second search has been running since Monday night. If this doesn't return any records with $7 in other fields, I suggest discontinuing work on $7. While there may be a few records with $7 (data provenance), running an indication rule of this kind in Alma requires significant system resources.

dchen077 commented 2 months ago

Thank you Junghae! I'll indicate that on the spreadsheet and move this issue on 250 to review then.

lake44me commented 1 month ago

Looks good with the ISBD based mappings.