search

uwlib-cams / MARC2RDA

mapping between MARC21 and RDA-RDF
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
33 stars 2 forks source link

IFLA 2025 Proposal #469

Open CECSpecialistI opened 3 weeks ago

CECSpecialistI commented 3 weeks ago

Call for proposals

szapoun commented 3 weeks ago

Dear Crystal, Laura, and Ebe, the Symposium has 3 subthemes: (“Technology Matters”, “Accessibility Matters”, or “Competencies Matters”). I think our work relates to the first subtheme. Alternatively, we could use the experience of the project to identify key competencies for metadata professionals. What do you prefer?

CECSpecialistI commented 3 weeks ago

Dear Crystal, Laura, and Ebe, the Symposium has 3 subthemes: (“Technology Matters”, “Accessibility Matters”, or “Competencies Matters”). I think our work relates to the first subtheme. Alternatively, we could use the experience of the project to identify key competencies for metadata professionals. What do you prefer?

I agree that our work relates to the first subtheme of "Technology Matters", particularly this suggested topic of interest: "Adapting metadata standards to emerging technologies, formats and content types"

lake44me commented 2 weeks ago

I would lean toward "Adapting metadata standards to emerging technologies, formats and content types"

...but have at least one slide that points to competencies.

A point that could be made - understanding of LRM/RDA is going to be necessary not just for metadata professionals, but those that build, revise and update our discovery systems, which should do more to adapt to the different data models than just "turn it into MARC"...

From: Crystal Yragui @.> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 10:56 AM To: uwlib-cams/MARC2RDA @.> Cc: Laura Akerman @.>; Assign @.> Subject: [External] Re: [uwlib-cams/MARC2RDA] IFLA 2025 Proposal (Issue #469)

Dear Crystal, Laura, and Ebe, the Symposium has 3 subthemes: (“Technology Matters”, “Accessibility Matters”, or “Competencies Matters”). I think our work relates to the first subtheme. Alternatively, we could use the experience of the project to identify key competencies for metadata professionals. What do you prefer?

I agree that our work relates to the first subtheme of "Technology Matters", particularly this suggested topic of interest: "Adapting metadata standards to emerging technologies, formats and content types"

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/uwlib-cams/MARC2RDA/issues/469#issuecomment-2450094903, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKBM2Y663XYCKARGEXGIZDZ6JAJXAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ5J7GESVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJQGA4TIOJQGM. You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>

szapoun commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Crystal, Laura, and Ebe I suppose we will present the project and Phase 1, right? If so, we need description of project, key milestones, phase 1 description, and some important findings during the process: e.g., different semantics between MARC21 and RDA, but also problems arising from local/legacy cataloguing policies, we could also refer to technical difficulties, like the one Cypress referred yesterday (LC cutting off access to API if many queries are done in a short time -- I hope I understood it correctly).

I propose (in order to get hings going) first decide on the bullets/issues that we will focus on. Afterwards we can find the proper title :)

CECSpecialistI commented 1 week ago

I agree with you Sofia. I think we can focus on the "technology matters" subtopic and touch on the others, and build out our abstract first and then the title. I've started us a Google Doc with some pertinent information to get us going here

CECSpecialistI commented 1 week ago

I put in some ideas that I feel connect our project to the symposium/IFLA's mission specifically here