Closed gerontakos closed 4 months ago
Regarding item 5: Some vocabularies will have the same alternative title. Is this ok?
Example: both Computer Files and Some/Common vocabulary sets have a vocabulary numbered 23, which means both will have
\
All done!
TG: extract obsolete values we use from spreadsheets; give to DKT1a. DKT will make sure they are present in the 008 vocabs 1ai.enter 8 values that were missing.1aii. enter values that have no home vocabulary 1aii1. create as many vocabularies as neededProv statement2a. DKT proof the statement and edit as needed.2b. Theo create the web document and complete the DOI2c. TG insert into the conceptScheme data using dct:provenance2d. store in Githud, uwlswd/datasetsChange conceptScheme titles (DKT) -- see issue 43a. Follow issue #43b. DKT is empowered to make decisions on thisAdd 2 dct:source triples to every ConceptSchem,e (follow issue #3)(TG) -- see issue 3Enter an alternative title in every concept scheme that describes the source vocabulary (DKT)~~5a. Like this:TG Write little script: -- see issue 26a. Remove skos:exactMatch triples from all concept descriptions (TG)6b. Remove all //skos:Concept @xml:lang="en" (TG)DOIs 📢 see full workflow "pipline" in issue 7 7a.
Initiate a draft DOI (Theo will do 2 on his own then sit down with DKYT and do like 5 together; then maybe DKT can do the remaining 16)7b.DataCite XML metadata--create in oXygenTransfer 6 vocabularies from 007 (2 in Visual Materials, 4 in Music) to 008.8a.Issue: They are copied into 008, but missing the history from 007.