The actual code is hidden behind an (intentionally?) opaque request process that literally requires a photo ID (???). There is no guarantee of receiving the code, there is no clear statement on the deciding factors for acceptance/rejection, nor is there a stated timeline between request submission and decision. Take note of all the Github Issues on this repository asking for an update on their access requests.
The Agilicious license agreement doesn't follow Open Source Initiative definitions of open source software: it does not grant the rights to freely modify, distribute, or sublicense the code and because of the obscure code request process we can't be sure there isn't discrimination.
The actual code is hidden behind an (intentionally?) opaque request process that literally requires a photo ID (???). There is no guarantee of receiving the code, there is no clear statement on the deciding factors for acceptance/rejection, nor is there a stated timeline between request submission and decision. Take note of all the Github Issues on this repository asking for an update on their access requests.
The Agilicious license agreement doesn't follow Open Source Initiative definitions of open source software: it does not grant the rights to freely modify, distribute, or sublicense the code and because of the obscure code request process we can't be sure there isn't discrimination.
This is false or misleading advertising.