I trained your model with swin_s for PA100K but there was noticable gap between my experiment(79.48) and your reported performance(80.35)
I assume that configuration i used for training is different from your settings.
Could you provide us more precise configuration for swin_s (PA100K)?
many thanks.
hi @macarize I train the swin_s model by replacing the BACKBONE.TYPE as "swin_s" in pa100k.yaml. Other configurations all remain the same. What is the epoch of your performance?
I trained your model with swin_s for PA100K but there was noticable gap between my experiment(79.48) and your reported performance(80.35) I assume that configuration i used for training is different from your settings. Could you provide us more precise configuration for swin_s (PA100K)? many thanks.