Create a MMI entry for "qualityControlDocument"

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Used to reference QC documentation

<sml:member name="qc" xlink:arcrole="qualityControlDocument">

DS templates will need to be updated when the MMI URI is available.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by wilcox.k...@gmail.com on 3 Jan 2013 at 3:52

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by wilcox.k...@gmail.com on 3 Jan 2013 at 4:09

• Added labels: Milestone-Release1.0, Type-Enhancement

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by dpsnowde...@gmail.com on 16 Jan 2013 at 6:51

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Need more information on the purpose.  I assume this is an identifier that 
points to a URI for a QC document on the web.  I suggest we add the term 
qualityControlDescription (not Document) to the following vocabulary.
http://mmisw.org/orr/#http://mmisw.org/ont/ioos/definition

Other attributes that need to be clarified in order to follow the format of the 
vocabulary above...

term: qualityControlDescription
reference: Not sure we have a reference for this concept
def_type: identifier
source: IOOS (though it would be worth some time browsing uncertweb.org or 
uncertML to see if this concept can be referenced)
description: URI of a document or description of the quality control procedures 
that have been applied to the data generated by the current procedure
name: Quality Control Description

Examples: 
      <sml:documentation>
        <sml:DocumentList>
          <sml:member name="qc" xlink:arcrole="http://mmisw.org/ont/ioos/definition/qualityControlDocument">
            <sml:Document>
              <gml:description>Handbook of Automated Data Quality Control Checks and Procedures, National Data Buoy Center, August 2009</gml:description>
              <sml:format>pdf</sml:format>
              <sml:onlineResource xlink:href="http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/NDBCHandbookofAutomatedDataQualityControl2009.pdf"/>
            </sml:Document>
          </sml:member>

Original comment by dpsnowde...@gmail.com on 30 Jan 2013 at 4:54

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by dpsnowde...@gmail.com on 30 Jan 2013 at 4:54

• Added labels: Priority-Medium

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I have added the term "qualityControlDescription" to the vocabulary 
http://mmisw.org/orr/#http://mmisw.org/ont/ioos/definition

I need some clarification now on the fields for the vocabulary.  

Thanks.

Original comment by robragsd...@gmail.com on 31 Jan 2013 at 2:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Rob: your MMI definition entry looks complete and fine to me. The only question 
I have is whether this term should be an identifier (the attribute value you 
entered for def_type), a classifier, or something new. classifier seems more 
appropriate, but I haven't been following the qualityControlDescription 
discussion closely.

Original comment by emilioma...@gmail.com on 31 Jan 2013 at 4:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Any thoughts on whether qualityControlDescription definition type should be a 
classifier or identifier?  I would like to close this issue within the the next 
day.    

Original comment by robragsd...@gmail.com on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I don't see why we need to specify that in the vocabulary defintion.  I think 
the classifier/identifier distinction is a function of how it is used in a 
document and not a basic characteristic of the word.  This means that a term or 
concept can be used in both roles depending on the context.  

Why do we need to specify now?  If you look at the example in comment 3 there 
is no distinction.  

Original comment by dpsnowde...@gmail.com on 7 Feb 2013 at 5:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I am closing this issue.  The decision is that the term classifier/identifier 
does not need to be specified in the definition.  The use of classifier or 
identifier is dependent on the context that the term is used for a document.    

Original comment by robragsd...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2013 at 2:43

• Changed state: Done