As of Milestone1.0 the History element in describe sensor is optional and
experimental.
Previous comments on this element suggested it could be used for important
status update about a sensor or platform.
<!-- Per discussion at IOOS DMAC meeting, from comment by Lisa H., 9/11/2012:
Use this scheme to include "status" messages (in the <gml:description> tag?),
like NVS' status updates!! This is doable! Maybe we'd want to implement a set
of standardized "event types" vocabulary, for sml:member@name? -->
Do we want to adopt such a convention and if so we should assign a milestone to
this issue.
David
Original issue reported on code.google.com by stu3b3 on 3 May 2013 at 3:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
stu3b3
on 3 May 2013 at 3:53