Closed chester256 closed 4 years ago
Yes, that's right. We also exclude the domain adversarial part.
Have you ever tried domain adversarial training? I have tried AdaptSegNet, but it seems that it will bring negative transfer.
Sorry for the late reply. No, we have not tried domain adversarial training. It would be interesting, but would need to be carried out separately for 2D and 3D. For 3D, there is very few work on this. PointDAN (https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02744) does only classification, not segmentation.
I am closing this as the question seems to be answered.
The paper says:
So for [17], the domain adversarial training part is also excluded? Is the pseudo-label part the only kept part? Thanks