In pre-publishing review (#91), I found a couple of confusing uses of naming. I do think this historical document could provide useful context unlike several other similar documents, however as it is, it's a bit confusing.
Valkey Design Draft 2 -- RDB version 7 info fields
Since this document is in context of Redis design decisions, we should probably remove Valkey from the heading
The Valkey RDB format lacks a simple way to add info fields to an RDB file without causing a backward compatibility issue even if the added meta data is not required in order to load data from the RDB file.
I would drop Valkey here as it was written by Salvatore.
I'd say let's delete this page. It doesn't belong in documentation. Besides, it's very outdated. Many changes have been done to the RDB file format since then.
In pre-publishing review (#91), I found a couple of confusing uses of naming. I do think this historical document could provide useful context unlike several other similar documents, however as it is, it's a bit confusing.
Since this document is in context of Redis design decisions, we should probably remove Valkey from the heading
I would drop
Valkey
here as it was written by Salvatore.