search

valnet / valuenetwork

Resource Planning and Value Accounting for Value Networks
http://mikorizal.org
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
99 stars 25 forks source link

NRP front page #502

Open TiberiusB opened 8 years ago

TiberiusB commented 8 years ago

On the front page there are a few fields "Work being done...", "Current needs. Get involved!", "Value being created" It is better to arrange those according to date, from most recent to further away in time. On SENSOPRICA's NRP front page, http://nrp.sensorica.co/ , the "Work being done..." is very long. It is more interesting to see what people are doing now, and cut this list to 6 months or so.

TiberiusB commented 8 years ago

I would also add most active projects. This helps sensoricans navigate to their projects faster, from the first page, by clicking on them, and find processes where they can log work. But it also shows other people development/work contexts that are busy.

fosterlynn commented 8 years ago

Good ideas.

bhaugen commented 8 years ago

Most active projects feature deployed, and I think the other improvements requested above were completed, too. Closing issue. Re-open if I missed something.

TiberiusB commented 8 years ago

Need to discuss the criteria used for this list? Is is last logs, frequency of logs, the amount of time, a combination of those and more? It`s a good start, but we need to tweak it.

I don`t think the Piezo pump should show in there http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/contributions/236/ It has one contribution in 2016 and the next one is in 2014

Same with the not defined project. http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/contributions/197/

Renovation lab should be pretty high in the list. http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/agent/406/ 206 contributions and almost all in 2016

TiberiusB commented 8 years ago

The "Work being done..." section is not very useful. It is too long and too granular... I think these types of work from processes are meaningless if not presented in context. The Process has more context. It is rare that we add descriptions to these types of work when we create them in processes. That would be a lot of work and realistically, now one will systematically do it. The names are self-descriptive. So we cannot rely on the description of types of work. One possibility is to cluster types of works and provide links to different processes, so one can chose to do something knowing more about the impact/purpose of this work.

TiberiusB commented 8 years ago

The "Value being created" section presents data that is not relevant to current activities. Does the filter only act on material assets? If so, I think we need to enlarge that to digital assets too.

sqykly commented 6 years ago

@TiberiusB It looks like there was an attempt to fix the "Purpose: " bit, since a {% if %} was added to see if there is a process associated, but the text still comes from the item itself. Do you want the item's description to override the process's if it has a description?

Tentatively I'm just switching it over to use the process's timeline_description, which is the process notes or the process type's description if there are no process notes.

sqykly commented 6 years ago

It looks like the "Value being created" section is now including documents and such, so that is fixed?