codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 88.60% // Head: 88.60% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
feb9ba5) compared to base (3d708bd). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #183 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 88.60% 88.60% ======================================= Files 73 73 Lines 5099 5099 ======================================= Hits 4518 4518 Misses 581 581 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `88.60% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=valory-xyz#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=valory-xyz). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=valory-xyz):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Adds in automatic image building Well that was frustrating.
I present;
A generalised release flow.
Features -> automatice author and service detection -> pushes packages -> pushes images. -> pushes both tagged images with the version which MUST BE SET IN THE WORKFLOW FOR NOW and the image generated with the agent hash as default