Open expipiplus1 opened 8 years ago
How is that more pleasant? Shouldn't they display the exact same interface?
intero.nvim is so fast it doesn't need to be used asynchronously.
Deoplete allows quite a lot of configuration.
Perhaps more importantly, it allows displaying completions from various sources at the same time, so one wouldn't be just limited to intero's suggestions.
Doesn't deoplete have an omnifunc source?
yes, I'm not sure what the state of it is. Last time I used it it wasn't really usable: slow and lacking some functionality.
Deoplete is quite a bit nicer as it does more than just prefix completion.
A deoplete backend would be great. It's often more pleasant then working via omnifunc.