Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I agree, issues 77, and 47 would also benefit from moving the rom caching
information from the GUI and putting it in core where all the plugins could
access.
Since MD5 is suggested as the mechanism for assigning GoodNames, issue 66 would
get
fixed also.
Just a reference, here are all the cached options from Project64:
Goodname
Country
Size
Comments / Notes (User)
Filename
Catride ID
CRC1
CRC2
CIC Chip
Developer
Filename
Force Feedback
Genre
Internal Name
Notes (Core)
Notes (Plugins)
Players
Release Date
I'm not suggesting to implement all of these. The Developer, and Genre seem
somewhat silly to me and we don't want to maintain too large a database of
items
not intrinsically in the ROM itself. We also might want to use MD5 instead of
dual
CRC to assign GoodNames and hence cheats.
Original comment by sknau...@wesleyan.edu
on 23 Apr 2008 at 7:42
I wrote up this document to aid us in the specifications of this system. This is
actually a high priority because a lot of things depend on it.
Original comment by sgorman07@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 1:25
Attachments:
After the branch is created you should put a version of this document in ODF or
whatever modifiable format in the doc folder, so that it can be kept up to date.
Original comment by richard...@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 1:51
I made okaygo's document into a wiki page, rather than keep it in svn:
http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus/wiki/RomCacheSystem
Original comment by ebenbl...@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 8:32
I will be working on this branch... feel free to help out how you see fit!
Original comment by sgorman07@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 10:09
This needs to be done ASAP
Original comment by sgorman07@gmail.com
on 11 May 2008 at 8:19
Critical priority is for bugs which are breaking builds or causing severe
malfunctions with normal program usage. This is really a new feature which
will fix
a couple of problems. Normally it would be Medium but since you indicated that
you
want to finish it before 1.4, it should be High.
Original comment by richard...@gmail.com
on 11 May 2008 at 8:37
I'd say with commit 554 this is Fixed. :) Richard wants to get 1.4 out sooner
rather than later, so the merge to trunk will occur right after the release. I
personally disagree, but don't think its important enough to argue. Setting to
fixed and removing 1.4 milestone.
Original comment by sknau...@wesleyan.edu
on 13 Jun 2008 at 5:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ebenbl...@gmail.com
on 22 Apr 2008 at 9:27