Closed fosterlynn closed 8 years ago
How about just referencing foaf:member
and/or org:memberOf
+ org:hasMember
. IMO we can't expect everyone to use qualified/n-ary relationship approach for simple group membership and need to make sure that we also support direct (binary) version which does NOT make use of vf:Relationship
and vf:relationship
.
Relevant discussion in AS2.0 tracker https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/289
IMO we can't expect everyone to use qualified/n-ary relationship approach for simple group membership and need to make sure that we also support direct (binary) version which does NOT make use of vf:Relationship and vf:relationship.
OK. Maybe we should make 2 separate models, and say, here's the two ways this can work. (Not a priority though I think?)
The member relationship as modeled here has no relationship to the vf:relationship / vf:Relationship. Got to figure out how to model this correctly, but I'm pretty sure this isn't right.
@elf-pavlik I'd like to discuss with you when you are back.