valueflows / vf-graphql

vf-graphql has moved to https://lab.allmende.io/valueflows/vf-graphql
Other
22 stars 3 forks source link

Feature/external specifications #76

Closed pospi closed 4 years ago

pospi commented 4 years ago

Pushing this in response to https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/pull/520

Mainly need to confirm that the logic for external specifications makes sense like this, or if we should have ExternalProcessSpecification and ExternalResourceSpecification distinct from ExternalSpecification. I don't think it will make much difference to implementors - they will likely store the external URIs internally in a way that disambiguates whether they are process or resource specs simply by the records they are attached to.

almereyda commented 4 years ago

We have moved the ValueFlows organization from GitHub to https://lab.allmende.io/valueflows.

This issue has been closed here, and all further discussion on this issue can be done at

https://lab.allmende.io/valueflows/vf-graphql/-/issues/76.

If you have not done so, you are very welcome to register at https://lab.allmende.io and join the ValueFlows organization there.