Closed ivozandhuis closed 3 years ago
En wat betekende die zin?
Dat we dit niet doen (https://linked.art/model/base/#types-of-types):
{
"@context": "https://linked.art/ns/v1/linked-art.json",
"id": "https://linked.art/example/object/24",
"type": "HumanMadeObject",
"_label": "Example Painting",
"classified_as": [
{
"id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300033618",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Painting",
"classified_as": [
{
"id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300435443",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Type of Work"
}
]
}
]
}
Maar wel:
{
"@context": "https://linked.art/ns/v1/linked-art.json",
"id": "https://linked.art/example/object/24",
"type": "HumanMadeObject",
"_label": "Example Painting",
"classified_as": [
{
"id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300033618",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Painting"
}
]
}
Dat is meer luiheid van mij kant, dat blijft lastig uit te leggen :) Data leveranciers mogen dat toevoegen als ze willen.
https://github.com/vangoghworldwide/linkedart#getty-vocabularies
Stond hier niet ooit een zin/alinea over dat we de hierarchie van de AAT hier niet willen herhalen?