vantage6 / vantage6-workshop

https://vantage6.github.io/vantage6-workshop/
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

[Overview] Chapter 2 #43

Open bartvanb opened 1 month ago

bartvanb commented 1 month ago

Desired solution

TODO:

Discuss:

dsmits commented 1 month ago

Some more feedback for chapter 2: #67

wbaccinelli commented 3 weeks ago

After reviewing the entire workshop material, I believe this chapter should begin with a description of the key v6-specific concepts. As it is now, there are multiple technical discussions that make reference to such concepts, and without this introduction, these lack context. For instance, most sections in this chapter refer to stuff that is related to collaborations or studies (concepts with a very specific interpretation in the context of v6), but at this point, participants don't know what those actually are. Maybe the high-level concept map and concept descriptions given in Chapter 3 should be moved here?

@bartvanb I think you're right. Looking at it now, I also think that the ""v6 administration" concepts might conceptually be part of the v6 basics in any case. @hcadavid how do you see moving the introduction of these concepts here in chapter 2 from chapter 3?

wbaccinelli commented 3 weeks ago

Add future changes to chapters

I don't remember exactly what we decided to do with the future developments section. @frankcorneliusmartin did we decide to remove it?

hcadavid commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @wbaccinelli, it makes sense to me (actually the comment you quoted was mine :)). I just pushed a PR of chapter 3 with a more 'user friendly' introduction to these concepts.

bartvanb commented 2 weeks ago

I don't remember exactly what we decided to do with the future developments section. @frankcorneliusmartin did we decide to remove it?

Frank is now on holiday but I think I talked with him about this and we assumed it was staying here

wbaccinelli commented 2 weeks ago

I don't remember exactly what we decided to do with the future developments section. @frankcorneliusmartin did we decide to remove it?

Frank is now on holiday but I think I talked with him about this and we assumed it was staying here

Alright, than I propose move these sections like this:

What do you think @bartvanb?

wbaccinelli commented 2 weeks ago

Missing image of PETOps cycle

This is also for @frankcorneliusmartin (after the holiday).