Open naufalfachrian opened 5 months ago
So looking at this I don't believe we need to rename it. We don't fall foul of the license since this is a Redis client and we're not shipping any Redis code or server functionality. I would be interested to see what other 3rd party clients do
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Redis is now adopting dual source-available licensing. This also updated requirements on the use of “Redis” in product names. Here's the full article.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context