Implement FHZ Binding

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would like to have a binding to the FHZ system 
(http://www.elv.de/fhz-1000-system.html).

At the Moment I use FHEM which works quite good but seems to be limited at 
complex logic and which has imho no good user interface.

I would perhaps implement the binding myself (I'm a java developer and has some 
experiences with Xtext) if 
- nobody else is developing such a binding
- it es possible from the architecture of openhab to include FHZ devices as 
actors and sensors
- someone could provide me a hint to so already implemented bindings which 
could be used as example for starting the implementation.

I haven't found a document in the wiki how to implement a new binding so a 
quick start guide in a few sentences would be nice.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Bernhard...@gmail.com on 21 Aug 2012 at 11:02

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi,
What do you use to access the FHZ devices? A CUL / CUNO stick ?
I also would like to develop a FS20 / FHZ Binding.

I have already developed a Java Library for CUL / CUNO.

http://code.google.com/p/jculfw/

I'm currently looking into how openHAB works and how to develop a binding.

In the discussion group there is also a post about FS20 and that one contains a 
contribution for CUL / FS20 only binding as a prototype.

I would like to have/develop bindings for FS20, FHT, IR, S300TH sensors and 
perhaps homematic. So basically every hardware that is supported by a CUL 
device.

Have fun,
Rossi

Original comment by rosstaus...@googlemail.com on 22 Aug 2012 at 10:30

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi guys - yes pretty cool, if you have Java (and OSGi) experience, this is 
perfect for implementing your own bindings.

The openhab architecture is meant to easily allow additional bindings. Indeed, 
we are missing some good documentation on how to do this.
After seeing an overwhelming interest in our project (very likely due to Heise 
;-)), we will very soon add a wiki page on how to implement a binding - so give 
us a few days time and you will find what you need to start with your work 
right away!

Best regards,
Kai

Original comment by kai.openhab on 22 Aug 2012 at 5:22

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Is there any progrss in this issue? FHZ binding would be really nice!

Original comment by mture...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2013 at 11:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'd like to know as well if there is any progress in this issue of if it just 
stalled?

Original comment by ralle-go...@ebrn.de on 29 Apr 2013 at 9:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Unfortunately no progress afaik.

Nevertheless FS20/FHT/Intertechno-Binding made good progress. See #227 for 
details.

Original comment by teichsta on 1 Aug 2013 at 1:54

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by teichsta on 5 Nov 2013 at 10:47

• Added labels: To-Github

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This issue has been migrated to Github. If this issue id is greater than103 its 
id has been preserved on Github. You can open your issue by calling the URL 
https://github.com/openhab/openhab/issues/<issueid>. Issues with ids less or 
equal 103 new ids were created.

Original comment by teichsta on 17 Nov 2013 at 8:08

• Added labels: Migrated-To-Github

[GoogleCodeExporter]

see above!

Issue has been migrated to Github and should be discussed there.

Original comment by teichsta on 21 Nov 2013 at 1:51

• Changed state: Invalid