Closed nigoroll closed 6 years ago
I can take this one, unless it rings a bell anywhere (in which case please shout)
no coredump :(
Same on my side:
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Child (30808) not responding to CLI, killed it.
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Unexpected reply from ping: 400 CLI communication error (hdr)
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Child (30808) not responding to CLI, killed it.
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Unexpected reply from ping: 400 CLI communication error
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Child (30808) died signal=6 (core dumped)
Mar 6 00:34:48 ip-172-31-34-215 varnishd[30798]: Child (30808) Panic at: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:34:48 GMT#012Assert error in ban_mark_completed(), cache/cache_ban.c line 159:#012 Condition((b
)->magic == 0x700b08ea) not true.#012version = varnish-5.2.1 revision 67e562482, vrt api = 6.1#012ident = Linux,4.9.62-10.57.amzn2.x86_64,x86_64,-jnone,-smalloc,-smalloc,-hcritbit,epoll#012n
ow = 4201900.4Mar 6 00:35:51 ip-172-31-34-215 systemd: Removed slice User Slice of root.
@nigoroll as we are having an issue with compiling latest libvmod-geoip2 with latest varnish 5.2 is there any temp workaround how to avoid that issue? Thanks.
You should ask the vmod maintainer.
I mean ban lurker issue. how to avoid it in 5.2.1.
среда, 7 марта 2018 г. пользователь Dridi Boukelmoune написал:
You should ask the vmod maintainer.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2556#issuecomment-371126075, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFwRfExjpNrdSW9WXjnkJmUmgYfjkL7ks5tb9VJgaJpZM4R7IR6 .
@nigoroll is it possible to create a patch against latest stable release for this fix?
thanks
About backporting: The ban lurker code is very different in 4.1, and I assume that this problem is not present there. If this surfaces for 4.1, then we can look at this again.
Re @vladbondarenko @slevchuk The fix https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/commit/5dd54f8390739c62c201e62c36eb515b1e03c2ee should work for 5.2 also. If you need more support, see http://varnish-cache.org/business/index.html#business