Closed brokenthorn closed 1 year ago
It just occurred to me that the next logical step after implementing Copy
would be to check the codebase for manual .clone()
's that can be replaced by copies, at least for the aesthetic benefits (I believe the Clone
impl already does the same byte copy as Copy
, so there is probably no efficiency benefit to doing this refactoring).
Am I wrong?
@varunsrin, not sure you saw this PR so tagging you just in case.
Looks great, thanks for making the change!
I'm supportive of the clone change
Addresses #60. Please kindly review.