main verb/reduced relative garden paths (REF?),

[vasishth]

This is about the sentences

The evidence examined

vs

The evidence that was examined

Citations are

Ferreira, F., & Clifton Jr, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of memory and language, 25(3), 348-368.

Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of memory and language, 33(3), 285-318.

[vasishth]

We are simply reporting what we found. Contradictory results have been reported for many phenomena: e.g., re- flexives processing (jaeger ̇etal ̇2020), main verb/reduced relative garden paths (REF?), predictive parsing effects (nieuwland ̇etal ̇2018),

here, i would cite both dillon et al 2013 and jaeger et al (the two opposing results) and the delong paper and nieuwland. similarly, for main clause/RR cite both papers mentioned above.

[vasishth]

While it seems unfortunate that the present and previous results together do not create a clear and unambiguous picture of the investigated phenomena, this divergence of results is not an anomaly within the scientific literature (nieuwland ̇etal ̇2018).

Here, you only cite Nieuwland? i would cite the papers you mention (and the ones I suggest) in the response letter.

[vasishth]

Should one not also mention:

• local coherence (Tabor vs Paape paper)
• Levy et al 2013 vs Vasishth et al 2018
• Van Dyke extra sentential paper vs Dani's JML paper which shows evidence against it?

These are all JML papers.

There's even more:

• Chinese relatives: Hsiao and Gibson 2003 and Gibson and Wu 2013 vs. Vasishth et al 2013 (PLoS ONE) and Jaeger et al 2013 (JML)
• Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences: Wagers et al 2009 vs Nicenboim and Vasishth 20?? (Cog Sci, the journal).

[vasishth]

Here is another one:

• Attenuation of agreement attraction due to case marking: Hartsuiker et al 2001, Avetisyan 2020 (both JML)

[PSchoknecht]

* Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences: Wagers et al 2009 vs Nicenboim and Vasishth 20?? (Cog Sci, the journal).

I cannot find the Nicenboim paper

[PSchoknecht]

Should one not also mention:

* local coherence (Tabor vs Paape paper)

How should I cite Dario's paper? So far, I cite the preprint.

[PSchoknecht]

* Chinese relatives: Hsiao and Gibson 2003 and Gibson and Wu 2013 vs. Vasishth et al 2013 (PLoS ONE) and Jaeger et al 2013 (JML)

You mean this "Lena A. Jäger, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, Chien-Jer Charles Lin, and Shravan Vasishth. The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing" from 2015, right?

[vasishth]

The Nicenboim paper is on my home page:

Bruno Nicenboim, Shravan Vasishth, Felix Engelmann, and Katja Suckow. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses in sentence processing: A case study of number interference in German. Cognitive Science, 42, 2018

Dario's paper should be cited as accepted pending minor revisions, JML. I edited Dario's entry in your bib and pushed.

Jaeger paper citation is correct.