The main parameter of interest is usually ζ , but τ
I think "not" might be missing.
I was also surprised by:
τ, which quantifies between-study variability or the noise in the measurement process
We didn't use the between-study context/example before. It totally makes sense in the context of metaanalysis but not in the context of measurement error which was also discussed above, so it might make sense to qualify this.
I think "not" might be missing.
I was also surprised by:
We didn't use the between-study context/example before. It totally makes sense in the context of metaanalysis but not in the context of measurement error which was also discussed above, so it might make sense to qualify this.