Closed timbitz closed 10 years ago
I think this is also done. It's common for the combine format.
Perhaps we want to add a few lines explaining the methods (the binomial test, etc.) but I think referring to the paper (as of now) should be enough.
Thoughts?
Currently, in the qual scores, score 4 for IR is a composite of read numbers and score 5 the balance p-value. If anyone thinks it's necessary, we could swap these two columns for slightly better consistency. Otherwise, the documentation should be changed to include the following:
Read coverage, based on uncorrected reads mapping only to the reference C1A, AC2 or C1C2 splice junctions (similar values as per Score 1). Always NA for intron retention events.
Imbalance of reads mapping to inclusion splice junctions (only for exon skipping events quantified by the a posteriori or a priori modules; For intron retention events, numbers of reads mapping to the upstream exon-intron junction, downstream intron-exon junction, and exon-exon junction in the format A=B=C) ...
Complexity of the event (only for exon skipping events quantified by the a posteriori or a priori modules); For intron retention events, p-value of a binomial test of balance between reads mapping to the upstream and downstream exon-intron junctions, modified by reads mapping to a 200-bp window in the centre of the intron (see Braunschweig et al., 2014). ...
Output format