vaticle-bot
commented
3 months ago PR Review Checklist
Do not edit the content of this comment. The PR reviewer should simply update this comment by ticking each review item below, as they get completed.
Trivial Change
- [ ] This change is trivial and does not require a code or architecture review.
Code
- [ ] Packages, classes, and methods have a single domain of responsibility.
- [ ] Packages, classes, and methods are grouped into cohesive and consistent domain model.
- [ ] The code is canonical and the minimum required to achieve the goal.
- [ ] Modules, libraries, and APIs are easy to use, robust (foolproof and not errorprone), and tested.
- [ ] Logic and naming has clear narrative that communicates the accurate intent and responsibility of each module (e.g. method, class, etc.).
- [ ] The code is algorithmically efficient and scalable for the whole application.
Architecture
- [ ] Any required refactoring is completed, and the architecture does not introduce technical debt incidentally.
- [ ] Any required build and release automations are updated and/or implemented.
- [ ] Any new components follows a consistent style with respect to the pre-existing codebase.
- [ ] The architecture intuitively reflects the application domain, and is easy to understand.
- [ ] The architecture has a well-defined hierarchy of encapsulated components.
- [ ] The architecture is extensible and scalable.
Usage and product changes
We autoformat the entire project using the root level rustfmt.toml and resolve most of cargo-clippy warnings.
Unresolved lints include:
dead_codein unused methods and enum variants, which are mostly placeholders for not yet implemented functionality,clippy::declare_interior_mutable_constforOnceLocks used in array initializers (the alternative approaches are too verbose for this PR),clippy::module_inception— would be an architectural change,clippy::upper_case_acronyms(e.g.,IID,FooAPI) — potential for later style discussion,clippy::type_complexity— architectural considerations are out of scope for this PR.