Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Varun,
Is there a reason why you start drone.exe and not ostinato.exe? Normally you
just need to run ostinato.exe which in turn will automatically start drone.exe
I run ostinato regularly on a Windows XP PC with 4 interfaces (phy and virtual
both included). I don't have access to a Windows Server 2003 PC, and hence I'd
like your help to debug this.
Can you install DebugView
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896647.aspx) and run
debugview before you start drone.exe. After it crashes, copy the log from
debugview and paste it here.
Regards,
Srivats
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2010 at 1:52
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2010 at 1:53
i have attached a log file from Debugview. i have 12 interfaces and 5 enabled.
ostianto just crashes whenever i start it. can you help me out here.
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2010 at 7:29
Attachments:
Varun,
Thanks for the DebugView log - I can see the bug in the code now - it is not
able to handle so many interfaces. Till the time I fix it, I want you to try
this workaround -
You say you have 12 interfaces out of which 5 are enabled. By "enabled", I
assume you mean "connected and operationally up". I want you to
administratively disable atleast 3 out of the 12 interfaces - once it is
disabled, it will not be visible to Ostinato - one way to check is to run
Wireshark, goto Capture | Interfaces and count how many interfaces are listed.
If you disable 3 out of 12, you will see 9 interfaces (plus one additional
Adaptor for generic dialup) listed. Now try running Ostinato.
Let me know how it goes.
Regards,
Srivats
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2010 at 4:50
hey hi,
thanks for a quick response. i tried disabling 3 and keeping 9 interfaces and
it works.:)
so, what is the problem with more than 9 interfaces and is it fixable?
one more important question, when i apply a new stream to any interface, it
takes too much time if i increase the number of packets to say 1000000. is
there any specific reason for it?
THANKS and REGARDS
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2010 at 6:53
Varun,
There is a buffer overflow for a large number of interfaces - it is fixable of
course - but it might take a couple of days before I get some time to do it.
Till that time continue with the workaround.
Regarding the time delay when you click "apply" for a stream with 1000000
packets, it is because it prebuilds all the 1 million packets in a buffer. I
will look at reducing the time - btw how much time does it take for you (on my
core2duo it takes around 15 seconds)?
If you have only one stream, instead of configuring 1 million packets, you can
just configure one packet in a loop - that way you won't face the time delay
Regards,
Srivats
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2010 at 5:00
it takes more than 100 seconds for me, and it kind of hangs after that. but
thats not a problem, i think you have already given the solution.
so, after you fix this bug, how many interfaces would it support??
Regards,
Varun
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2010 at 11:32
Varun,
I hope to fix it in a way so that there isn't a max limit on the number of
interfaces.
Regards,
Srivats
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2010 at 3:14
heyy, is there any way i can have a look at the code and fix this bug??
Regards,
varun
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 28 Sep 2010 at 6:22
@varun: Sure! Go ahead! It's open source after all :-)
Go to the source tab for instructions on how to download the code or browse it
online
To start you off, here are some pointers -
- you need to look at the RPC Server and Channel code in the rpc directory
- the problem is the value of MSGBUF_SIZE currently defined to 4096
- When serializing/parsing messages we use an array sized as per MSGBUF_SIZE
- the quick fix is to increase MSGBUF_SIZE; although this doesn't really solve
the problem
- the correct solution is to use the protobuf serialize/parse to/from stream
API instead of the array APIs
Let me know if you need help
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 28 Sep 2010 at 8:10
@varun: any luck with the changes?
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 1:50
hey.. hi i couldn't compile the code on my machine because of QT stuff. i was
having problems compiling the Qt code.:(
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 2:04
@varun: You don't need to compile Qt. You should be able to get a binary QT
package for your platform. What platform are you using?
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 2:14
i am running ostinato on windows.
Original comment by varun.co...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 2:25
@varun: You can download the Qt SDK from http://qt.nokia.com/downloads. For
complete instructions on how to compile from source, see
http://code.google.com/p/ostinato/wiki/BuildingFromSource
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 2:43
This issue was closed by revision 35f0b0a58c.
Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 12:15
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
varun.co...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2010 at 7:18