Closed mys007 closed 7 years ago
Hi, thanks for the issue report
for both 1.
and 2
you are right, It might affect the demo quite a bit.
@edgarriba any more ideas?
By the way if you have fixes for those two things feel free to send us a PR.
@mys007 thanks for your feedback. As @vbalnt said send us a PR with the changes. Besides, probably you will notice some issues with rotated patches. This https://github.com/vbalnt/tfeat/blob/master/tfeat_demo.py#L32 need to be tested since it was not working as expected.
Thanks for confirmation. Well, I've just hacked it in my version so that it roughly worked (-0.5, no division), I in fact don't know what are the proper normalization values. I suggest you as authors fix it:).
There is now code that shows how to do the the mi,sigma
norm.
For more, please check #5
@mys007 just in case: mean = 0.443728476019 std = 0.20197947209
Great!
First of all, thanks for open-sourcing your code. I have two questions/issues regarding
tfeat_demo.py
:1) The extracted patches should be normalize to the ranges the network was trained on. In training, I belive one uses [0,1] range and subtracts mean (~0.48) and divides by stddev (~0.18). In testing, opencv works with [0,255] range and L75 just subtracts mean of each patch.
2) ORB may be involuntarily disadvantaged by using improper matching (
cv2.NORM_HAMMING
is recommended overcv2.NORM_L2
, which is useful for tfeat).