I have a search that was done with MBR on and standard MaxLFQ normalization, but when I run this code in R to recreate the report_pg.matrix, I end up with more protein group IDs than in the original automatically generated matrix.
However, when I set the above cutoff values to 0.01, however, I end up with less IDs than in the automatically generated pg_matrix.
When I use these global filters instead, I end up with less IDs again.
prot_maxLFQ<- df %>% dplyr::filter(Global.PG.Q.Value <= 0.05 & Global.Q.Value<=0.05) %>% diann_matrix(id.header="Protein.Group", quantity.header = "PG.MaxLFQ", pg.q=0.05)
(It might be helpful to mention that I don't have this issue with recreating the PR matrix.) What filters exactly are being used to generate the report.pg_matrix? Thank you!
I have a search that was done with MBR on and standard MaxLFQ normalization, but when I run this code in R to recreate the report_pg.matrix, I end up with more protein group IDs than in the original automatically generated matrix.
prot_maxLFQ<- df %>% dplyr::filter(Lib.PG.Q.Value <= 0.05 & Lib.Q.Value<=0.05 ) %>% diann_matrix(id.header="Protein.Group", quantity.header = "PG.MaxLFQ", pg.q=0.05)
However, when I set the above cutoff values to 0.01, however, I end up with less IDs than in the automatically generated pg_matrix.
When I use these global filters instead, I end up with less IDs again. prot_maxLFQ<- df %>% dplyr::filter(Global.PG.Q.Value <= 0.05 & Global.Q.Value<=0.05) %>% diann_matrix(id.header="Protein.Group", quantity.header = "PG.MaxLFQ", pg.q=0.05)
(It might be helpful to mention that I don't have this issue with recreating the PR matrix.) What filters exactly are being used to generate the report.pg_matrix? Thank you!