Closed bp-dl closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the patch and the testing. Looking at the datasheet, option byte handling should be the same for all stm8af52a?, so we should leave the name at that. Also according to the datasheet, the stm8af62a? behaves the same wrt .option handling (I think it is just an stm852a? with the can peripheral disabled), so I suggest to also update that entry.
Also, could you update the README.md with what you have tested yourself (i.e. add ok in fields as appropriate)?
This adds support for the STM8AF52A8. The flash programming side of things has been tested quite a bit. The EEPROM and option byte programming could still use more testing.