Greetings again, team. I have created the following pull request aiming to enhance the code coverage of the secp256k1 tests. Specifically, the proposed modifications target two instances:
Wrong case of derivePublicKey
Wrong cases of signature
Wrong cases of recovery
These amendments aim to improve the robustness and reliability of our bloom filter tests, ensuring a more comprehensive evaluation of its performance and functionality.
coverage: 92.925% (+1.6%) from 91.293% when pulling 5cc79629572364a050f73b13db08bdc358ae981e on rodolfopietro97:increase-code-coverage-secp256k1 into b35914b5da547628895c627ab6b3abc72264ffef on vechain:master.
Greetings again, team. I have created the following pull request aiming to enhance the code coverage of the secp256k1 tests. Specifically, the proposed modifications target two instances:
These amendments aim to improve the robustness and reliability of our bloom filter tests, ensuring a more comprehensive evaluation of its performance and functionality.
Code coverage BEFORE:
Code coverage AFTER: