Closed vector76 closed 2 years ago
CAM packages often generate G0 for rapids and G1 as operations, whereas 3D printers and slicers often ignore the distinction.
This would be an alternative to the default strategy of using the lowest Z position to infer cutting vs. rapid movement operations.
Implemented in version 1.0.4. Not an option, because there is really nothing good about the old lowest-Z approach.
CAM packages often generate G0 for rapids and G1 as operations, whereas 3D printers and slicers often ignore the distinction.
This would be an alternative to the default strategy of using the lowest Z position to infer cutting vs. rapid movement operations.