Closed jan-kaspar closed 3 years ago
Good to know. However, we were actually considering to enforce COMPACT=1 in the near future. Does your hardware not have 64 bit integers?
Many thanks @johncbowman for the quick fix!
My reason for using COMPACT=0 is the ROOT extension that I developed:
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kaspj0am/doku.php?id=en:prog:asyroot
I apologise, the documentation is somewhat outdated, e.g. the uptodate code is now in GitHub:
https://github.com/jan-kaspar/asymptote/tree/root
The extension needs to have access to the vm::item::type()
, e.g.:
https://github.com/jan-kaspar/asymptote/blob/root/root.cc#L689
which is only available with COMPACT=0
https://github.com/jan-kaspar/asymptote/blob/root/item.h#L160
Would there be any possibility to get access to the item type with COMPACT=1 ?
Somewhat related question, would it be conceivable to merge this extension to the official code base? I guess this is a necessity to get more people using it...
Many thanks in advance!
It seems to me that dbc74f5b52f9c610324fbc1c2f6ec946be3d8ef1 (and previous) has introduced a compilation problem when
COMPACT=0
is used. In particular, file.io usesvm::Undefined
https://github.com/vectorgraphics/asymptote/blob/dbc74f5b52f9c610324fbc1c2f6ec946be3d8ef1/fileio.h#L225 which is only defined whenCOMPACT
is enabled: https://github.com/vectorgraphics/asymptote/blob/dbc74f5b52f9c610324fbc1c2f6ec946be3d8ef1/item.h#L29-L34