Closed axeljen closed 2 months ago
Dear @axeljen,
Yes, it's totally find to keep N
(or another ambiguous character) in the alignment. But unless you have a full "unknown" codon (NNN
), HyPhy
will handle such characters as partially missing data.
For example, CGa>NNa
(CGA>AAA, CGA>ACA
and so on) can be viewed as a 16-way ambiguity that contributes some (but not that much) information. Generally most of the signal will come from resolved bases.
HTH, Sergei
Stale issue message
Hi,
I have a question about the output of HyPhy meme. In the output summary table, in the 'most common codon substitutions at this site', it seems that 'N' is listed as substitutions. For example, this is what I get in this column for one of my analyzed sites: [2]cgA>cgN|[1]cGa>cAa,CGa>NNa,Gga>Cga
As I understand it it should be fine to keep Ns in the alignment, so I just got a little confused about seeing this in the output and wanted to make sure that the Ns indeed doesn't contribute to the detection of episodic selection?
Thanks and sorry if I'm missing something obvious!
Best, Axel