Open rekado opened 5 years ago
@slinnarsson @pkharchenko could you please comment on this?
I don't particularly care which one it is, and I think they are essentially identical. To me, the BSD 2-clause license is easier to read and understand, so I propose we go with that.
Same here. Don’t care which one. We listed GPL-3 for velocyto.R DESCRIPTION file, but we don’t actually use any GPL code within, so that can be easily relaxed.
On Mar 27, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Sten Linnarsson notifications@github.com wrote:
I don't particularly care which one it is, and I think they are essentially identical https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/217/what-are-the-essential-differences-between-the-bsd-and-mit-licences. To me, the BSD 2-clause license is easier to read and understand, so I propose we go with that.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/velocyto-team/velocyto.py/issues/182#issuecomment-477240280, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALT78k8z1WNiirc2yEg_EU2heRLecZpnks5va5ybgaJpZM4bwH2S.
Hi,
I just packaged velocyto.py 0.17.17 for GNU Guix, the reproducible functional package manager. I'm a little unclear on the license, though, because http://velocyto.org/velocyto.py/license/index.html says that the license is the Expat license (aka "MIT license"), while the repository declares the license to be BSD-2.
Could you please clarify which license actually applies?
Thank you very much!