Closed GidonFrischkorn closed 6 months ago
I checked this again, and it actually is not a serious problem, as all non-target mixtures are switched off using the Index-Coding we implemented. So, likely the estimated sd
in these model just represents samples from the prior. The same happens in the imm
models for the a
and s
parameters for set size = 1
Yes, I noticed that some time ago but concluded the same that it's not a problem because we turn the effects off. It could still be confusing to users, so I'll see if there's an easy way to fix those to a constant too
it was an easy solve, PR is up
Describe the bug When working on the revisions of the tutorial paper I noticed that when we estimate the
mixture3p
using random effects for theset_size
variable that there are still random effects estimated forthetant
for set size = 1. See screenshot belowTo Reproduce You can see the specified call to
bmm
in the screenshot of the summary.Expected behavior Ideally, we should fix the
sd
to zero and list them underConstant Parameters
. But I do not know if this is possible via priors. There might be constraint thatsd
parameters cannot be fixed to zero, but only a value very close to zero.