Closed bymayo closed 1 year ago
Are you using the built-in Remote Icon set, or using your own self-hosted Font Awesome packs?
@engram-design Just the built in one (Which I think is also slightly outdated as lot of the new FA icons aren't in the list)
Yeah, I'd been debating updating it, but they've also changed he mechanism of delivery for newer updates. I don't believe there'll be a free CDN for the icons, instead you'd need to create a hosted kit. Still thinking about this
@engram-design this is a must to have, some icons from the free set are prefixed with fab
( for the brands ) some are prefixed with fas
, fal
, fab
or far
We just load them in through NPM the full package and build it accordingly, but it requires to build up your classes as fab fa-facebook-f
or fal fa-external-link-alt
which would be different than far fa-external-link-alt
I see that you could simply add a prefix
value to be outputted as well
Added better support for Font Awesome 5/6 in 2.0.0
Description
Because Font Awesome comes with different styles (Regular, Solid, Light, Brands, Duotone) it would be good if you could set which style you wanted to output, currently theres no way of specifying this in the CMS.
So this would then output the correct class e.g.
.fab
for brands or.fal
for light etc.So currently if you choose Facebook icon, it won't out put as the class for the icon needs to be
fab fa-facebook
.