Field data in database not showing in editor but present in frontend - Githubissues

verbb / vizy

A flexible visual editor for Craft CMS

Other

44 stars 8 forks source link

Field data in database not showing in editor but present in frontend #231

Open mattbloomfield opened 1 year ago

mattbloomfield commented 1 year ago

Describe the bug

Hi all - love Vizy so much - just having a weird issue we are trying to solve.

We just migrated the content from a separate site into our flagship site (USChamber.com) and in a few instances we are seeing entries where the content renders on the frontend, is present in the database, but the vizy field is empty.

We migrated using feedme and it worked for the vast majority of pages.

What I see in the database:

[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"U.S. Supreme Court Briefing ","marks":[{"type":"bold"}]},{"type":"text","text":"(reverse chronological order)"}]},{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Merits Stage","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"bold"}]}]},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Decided","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Opinion20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" 6/26/2014."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Argued","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Transcript20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" 1/13/2014."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Petitioner NLRB's reply brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Reply20Brief20for20Petitioner20on20the20Merits2020-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 12/18/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Reply brief of Charging Party/D.C. Circuit Intervenor/Respondent Teamsters","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Reply20brief20of20International20Brotherhood20of20Teamsters20in20Support20of20Petitioner20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 12/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"25 merits amici curiae briefs in support of respondent filed 11/25/2013 by"},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"American Civil Rights Union","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/American%20Civil%20Rights%20Union%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Atlantic Legal and Justice Foundation","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Atlantic%20Legal%20and%20Justice%20Foundation%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Bulger et al","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Bulger%20et%20al%20%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Cato Institute","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Cato%20Institute%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Citizens United","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Citizens%20United%20amicus%20brief%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Coalition for a Democratic Workplace et al","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Coalition%20for%20a%20Democratic%20Workplace%20et%20al%20%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Constitutional Law Scholars","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Constitutional%20Law%20Scholars%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Council on Labor Law Equality","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Council%20on%20Labor%20Law%20Equality%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Daycon Products Company, Inc.","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Daycon%20Products%20Company,%20Inc.%20%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":","}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"ILWU Union","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/ILWU%20Union%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Independence Institute","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Independence%20Institute%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Judicial Watch","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Judicial%20Watch%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Landmark Legal Foundation","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Landmark%20Legal%20Foundation%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Mountain States Legal Foundation","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Mountain%20States%20Legal%20Foundation%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"National Federation of Independent Business","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/National%20Federation%20of%20Independent%20Business%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"National Right to Work","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/National%20Right%20to%20Work%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Originalist Scholars","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Originalist%20Scholars%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Political Scientists and Historians","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Political%20Scientists%20and%20Historians%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Professor Tuan Samahon","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Samahon%20Amicus%20Brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Canning%20%28U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%29.pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Senate Parlimentary Experts Robert B. Dove and Martin B. Gold","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Senate%20Parlimentary%20Experts%20Robert%20B.%20Dove%20and%20Martin%20B.%20Gold%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"U.S. Senate Republicans","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Senate%20Republicans%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Southeastern Legal Foundation","marks":[{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Southeastern%20Legal%20Foundation%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20%28U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%29.pdf"}},{"type":"underline"}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Speaker of the House John Boehner","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Speaker%20of%20the%20House%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"State National Bank of Big Spring & CEI, et al","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/State%20National%20Bank%20of%20Big%20Spring,%20CEI,%20et%20al%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Alabama & 16 States","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/States%20amicus%20brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]}]}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Respondent Noel Canning's response brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/Respondent's+brief+--+NLRB+v.+Noel+Canning+(U.S.+Supreme+Court).pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed by U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, et al. 11/18/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"3 merits amici curiae briefs in support of petitioner filed 9/2013 by"},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Brennan Center","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Merits%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20The%20Brennan%20Center%20for%20Justice%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Constitutional Accountability Center","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Merits%20Amicus%20Brief%20for%20Constitutional%20Accountability%20Center%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Professor Victor Williams","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Merits%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Victor%20Williams%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":"."}]}]}]}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Brief of Charging Party/D.C. Circuit Intervenor/Respondent Teamsters in support of petitioner","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Brief20of20International20Brotherhood20of20Teamsters20Local2076020-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 9/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Opening merits brief for Petitioner NLRB","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Brief20for20the20Petitioner20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 9/13/2013."}]}],"text":""}]},{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Certiorari Stage","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"bold"}]}]},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Cert. granted 6/24/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Petitioner NLRB reply brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Reply20Brief20for20The20Petitioner20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed on 6/6/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Four amici curiae briefs in support of certiorari filed 5/28/2013 by"},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"U.S. Senators","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Senators%20Amicus%20Cert%20Brief%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Coalition for a Democratic Workplace","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Amicus%20Brief%20of%20the%20Coalition%20for%20a%20Democratic%20Workplace%20in%20Support%20of%20Cert.%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme.pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Professor Victor Williams","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Victor%20Williams%20in%20Support%20of%20Petitioner%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Constitutional Accountability Center","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/scotus/files/2013/Amicus%20Brief%20for%20Constitutional%20Accountability%20Center%20--%20NLRB%20v.%20Noel%20Canning%20(U.S.%20Supreme%20Court).pdf"}}]}]}]}]}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Brief of Charging Party/D.C. Circuit Intervenor Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters in support of certiorari","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Brief20for20International20Brotherhood20of20Teamsters20Local2076020In20Support20of20the20Petition20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 5/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Respondent Noel Canning's response brief in support of certiorari","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Brief20of20Respondent20Noel20Canning20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed by U.S. Chamber Litigation Center 5/23/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Petitioner ","marks":[{"type":"underline"}]},{"type":"text","text":"NLRB's certiorari petition","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Cert.20petition20-20NLRB20v.20Noel20Canning2028U.S.20Supreme20Court29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 4/25/2013."}]}],"text":""}]},{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"D.C. Circuit Court Briefing","marks":[{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"http://www.chamberlitigation.com/cases/noel-canning-v-national-labor-relations-board-nlrb"}},{"type":"underline"},{"type":"bold"}]},{"type":"text","text":" ","marks":[{"type":"bold"}]},{"type":"text","text":"(reverse chronological order)"}]},{"type":"bulletList","content":[{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"D.C. Circuit decision","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Decision20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" issued 1/25/2013."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Amicus curiae brief of Professor Victor Williams in support of NLRB","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Prof.20Victor20Williams20amicus20brief20in20support20of20respondent20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 11/2/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Intervenor Teamsters brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/International20Brotherhood20of20Teamsters20Brief20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 12/5/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Petitioner Noel Canning and Intervenor U.S. Chamber reply brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20and20Chamber20of20Commerce20Reply20Brief20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 11/20/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Respondent NLRB answering brief","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/NLRB20Answering20Brief20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 10/26/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Petitioner Noel Canning and Intervenor U.S. Chamber motion to consolidate oral argument","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Petitioner+and+Intervenors'+Motion+to+Consolidate+Oral+Argument+--+Noel+Canning+v.+NLRB+(DC+Circuit).pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 10/11/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"3 "},{"type":"text","text":"amici curiae","marks":[{"type":"italic"}]},{"type":"text","text":"briefs in support of Noel Canning filed by "},{"type":"text","text":"U.S. Senators","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Amicus20Brief20for20Senator20McConnell2C20et20al.20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028DC20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":", "},{"type":"text","text":"Speaker of the House John Boehner","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Amicus20Brief20of20Speaker20of20the20House20John20Boehner20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028DC20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":", and "},{"type":"text","text":"Landmark Legal Foundation","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Amicus20Brief20of20Landmark20Legal20Foundation20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028DC20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" 9/26/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Opening brief of petitioner Noel Canning and intervenor U.S. Chamber","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Opening20Brief20of20Noel20Canning20and20Chamber20-20Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028D.C.20Circuit29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 9/19/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Court response to intervention motion","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20National20Labor20Relations20Board2028Court20Response20to20Intervention20Motion29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" issued 6/21/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"U.S. Chamber's reply to NLRB's opposition to intervention","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20National20Labor20Relations20Board2028Reply20on20Chamber20Motion20to20Intervene29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 4/23/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"NLRB opposition to U.S. Chamber's motion to intervene","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028Opposition20of20NLRB20to20Motion20to20Intervene29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 4/5/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Motion of NRTW to intervene","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028NRTW20Intervention20Motion29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 3/23/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Motion of Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters to intervene","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028Teamsters20Intervention20Motion29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 3/21/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Motion of U.S. Chamber to intervene","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20National20Labor20Relations20Board2028Motion20to20Intervene29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" filed 3/15/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Noel Canning's petition for review of NLRB decision","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20National20Labor20Relations20Board2028Noel20Cannning20Petition20for20Review29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" 2/24/2012."}]}],"text":""},{"type":"list_item","content":[{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"NLRB decision against Noel Canning","marks":[{"type":"underline"},{"type":"link","attrs":{"href":"https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Noel20Canning20v.20NLRB2028NLRB20Decision29.pdf"}}]},{"type":"text","text":" 2/8/2012."}]}],"text":""}]},{"type":"paragraph","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Judges in this case: Sentelle, Chief Judge; Henderson and Griffith, Circuit Judges."}]}]

I think we had this issue once before and I had to go in and delete a few keys in the JSON array and resave it.

Steps to reproduce

This is a hard one to reproduce, but I can give you a login if you'd like to see it firsthand.

Craft CMS version

Craft Pro 3.7.63

Plugin version

1.0.22

Multi-site?

No

Additional context

This is the vizy config for that field:

    "buttons": [
        "html",
        "formatting",
        "h3",
        "bold",
        "italic",
        "strike",
        "ordered-list",
        "unordered-list",
        "hr",
        "highlight",
        "align-left",
        "align-right",
        "align-center",
        "align-justify",
        "clear-format",
        "line-break",
        "link",
        "image",
        "undo",
        "redo"
    ],
    "formatting": [
        "paragraph",
        "blockquote",
        "h3"
    ],
    "toolbarFixed": true
}

engram-design commented 1 year ago

Sorry, seemed to have missed this coming through. Are there any JS errors? I would mention that I've seen this happen where the editor is blank when there are invalid nodes in the content. It's a massive frustration with how Tiptap's schema processing works where it's a bit all-or-nothing.

I can see there's a warning for me:

Invalid content. Passed value: {type: 'doc', content: Array(8)} Error: RangeError: Unknown node type: list_item

Which states an issue with the node type list_item which should be listItem (camelCase not snake_case). These node names were changed between Vizy 1 and Vizy 2. This might be due to the Feed Me migration which might've been outdated at the time.