Open dmfay opened 3 years ago
having the same issue when trying to bundle a .mjs
file (e.g: esm/index.mjs
):
ReferenceError: require is not defined in ES module scope, you can use import instead
at eval (eval at 874 (file:///Users/lex/Projects/FLDV/FLDV-P008/node_modules/@flex-development/trext/src/index.ts:7:15), <anonymous>:1:1)
at Object.874 (file:///Users/lex/Projects/FLDV/FLDV-P008/node_modules/@flex-development/trext/src/index.ts:7:15)
at __nccwpck_require__ (file:///Users/lex/Projects/FLDV/FLDV-P008/node_modules/@flex-development/trext/esm/trext.mjs:57:41)
at file:///Users/lex/Projects/FLDV/FLDV-P008/node_modules/@flex-development/trext/esm/trext.mjs:100:81
at file:///Users/lex/Projects/FLDV/FLDV-P008/node_modules/@flex-development/trext/esm/trext.mjs:113:3
at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:175:25)
at async Loader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:178:24)
at async Object.loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:68:5)
/******/ // Execute the module function
/******/ var threw = true;
/******/ try {
/******/ __webpack_modules__[moduleId](module, module.exports, __nccwpck_require__);
/******/ threw = false;
/******/ } finally {
/******/ if(threw) delete __webpack_module_cache__[moduleId];
/******/ }
in my case, createRequire
is only imported if i bundle src/index.ts
instead (haven't tested it yet, but judging from the output i believe it works as expected).
For my use case, I was using the sqlite
and sqlite3
modules. I was able to avoid this error by leaving them external in my build command:
ncc build src/index.ts -m -s --target es2020 -e sqlite3 -e sqlite
I've got minify and source maps turned on. The relevant part for other folks should be the -e
external flag.
same issue
+1 - I believe I'm encountering this same issue - https://github.com/chrisreddington/rss-parser/pull/120
It seems that not all require()
statements are replaced by __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("package_name");
.
ncc build
without -m
option;require("package_name")
operators with __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("package_name");
;dist
directory run ncc build index.js -o ./ -m
to create a minified version.// Before replacement
module.exports = eval("require")("@aws-sdk/signature-v4-crt");
module.exports = require("assert");
module.exports = __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("http2");
// After replacement
module.exports = __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("@aws-sdk/signature-v4-crt");
module.exports = __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("assert");
module.exports = __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("http2");
// After minification
e=>{e.exports=(0,o.createRequire)(import.meta.url)("@aws-sdk/signature-v4-crt")};
e=>{e.exports=(0,o.createRequire)(import.meta.url)("assert")};
e=>{e.exports=(0,o.createRequire)(import.meta.url)("http2")};
Comment:
It looks like some require("package_name")
are being replaced with eval("require")("package_name")
. Perhaps this should also be replaced with __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_createRequire(import.meta.url)("package_name");
.
My package.json
{
"main": "build/index.js",
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"start": "ts-node src/index.ts",
"build": "ncc build src/index.ts -o build -m --license licenses.txt"
},
"dependencies": {
"@actions/core": "1.10.0",
"@aws-sdk/client-s3": "3.289.0",
"mime-types": "2.1.35"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@types/mime-types": "2.1.1",
"@types/node": "18.15.0",
"@vercel/ncc": "0.36.1",
"ts-node": "10.9.1",
"typescript": "4.9.5"
}
}
tsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"rootDir": "src",
"outDir": "build",
"target": "ES2022",
"module": "NodeNext",
"moduleResolution": "NodeNext",
"lib": ["ESNext"],
"types": ["node"],
"strict": true,
"noImplicitAny": true,
"esModuleInterop": true,
"allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true
},
"exclude": [
"build",
"node_modules"
],
"ts-node": {
"esm": true
}
}
Same error when using ES6 in a GitHub action based on https://github.com/actions/javascript-action @vercel/ncc version 0.36.1
ReferenceError: require is not defined in ES module scope, you can use import instead
This file is being treated as an ES module because it has a '.js' file extension and '/runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/status-check/package.json' contains "type": "module". To treat it as a CommonJS script, rename it to use the '.cjs' file extension.
at eval (eval at 553 (file:///runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/webpack:/javascript-action/node_modules/@vercel/ncc/dist/ncc/@@notfound.js:1:1), <anonymous>:1:1)
at Object.553 (file:///runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/webpack:/javascript-action/node_modules/@vercel/ncc/dist/ncc/@@notfound.js:1:1)
at __nccwpck_require__ (file:///runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/webpack:/javascript-action/webpack/bootstrap:21:1)
at file:///runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/status-check/index.js:2827:78
at file:///runner/_work/_actions/[...]/dist/status-check/index.js:2859:3
at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:193:25)
at async Promise.all (index 0)
at ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:530:24)
at loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:91:5)
at handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:65:12)
Any solution?
npm install ncc@latest
npx ncc build ./path/file2build.js -o .
This has solved the issue for me.
npm install ncc@latest
npx ncc build ./path/file2build.js -o .
This has solved the issue for me.
I guess you mean:
npm install @vercel/ncc@latest
I'm using "@vercel/ncc@lastest" as well (0.36.1 right now) , with node 16.20.1
This bug is nearly 2 years old. How is this not solved yet?
This issue still happens, no official fixes yet?
Seems like I was able to apply a workaround for this problem: polyfilling require
in ESM like this:
// File: "polyfill-require-in-esm.mjs"
/**
* This ESM module polyfills "require".
* It is needed e.g. when bundling ESM scripts via "@vercel/ncc" because of https://github.com/vercel/ncc/issues/791.
*/
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';
import url from 'node:url';
const __filename = url.fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
globalThis.require = createRequire(__filename);
// File: "my-script.mjs"
import './polyfill-require-in-esm.mjs';
// now do everything else, importing other packages and stuff
Seems like I was able to apply a workaround for this problem: polyfilling
require
in ESM like this:
I've tried your workaround but it didn't work for me unfortunately
I still get
This file is being treated as an ES module because it has a '.js' file extension and '/.../dist/status-check/package.json' contains "type": "module". To treat it as a CommonJS script, rename it to use the '.cjs' file extension.
at eval (eval at 553 (file:///.../dist/webpack:/javascript-action/node_modules/@vercel/ncc/dist/ncc/@@notfound.js:1:1), <anonymous>:1:1)
This helped me (gnu sed in OSX "is" gsed).
gsed -i 's/module=>{module.exports=eval("require")("")}/module=>{module.exports={}}/g' index.js
I found this piece of code in my build:
module.exports = eval("require")("@actions/cache");
This happened because @actions/cache
was not installed in my dependencies.
I suggest looking into your build for any require
calls.
Either way NCC should not output such eval("require")
calls in ESM envs.
I found this piece of code in my build:
Thanks for the tip. In my case I hit this error because in my source code I had
import { App } from `./App`;
and the build contained
module.exports = eval("require")("./App");
changing it to
import { App } from `./App.js`;
fixed the problem :/
I'm trying to compile an ES module (
"type": "module"
) that uses tree-sitter. The compiled distributable winds upimport
ing createRequire as expected, but still tries to load native code via old-fashionedrequire
.package.json
```json { "name": "ncctest", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "", "main": "index.js", "type": "module", "scripts": { "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1" }, "author": "", "license": "ISC", "dependencies": { "tree-sitter": "^0.19.0", "tree-sitter-javascript": "^0.19.0" }, "devDependencies": { "@vercel/ncc": "^0.31.1" } } ```index.js
```js 'use strict'; import * as TreeSitter from 'tree-sitter'; import JavaScript from 'tree-sitter-javascript'; const parser = TreeSitter.default(); parser.setLanguage(JavaScript); ```The offending
require
in question: