Open PatrykWojcieszak opened 6 months ago
We cannot easily recreate the issue with the provided information. Please add a minimal reproduction in order for us to be able to help more efficiently.
please simplify reproduction
label?There was a reproduction provided, but due to its complexity, we cannot easily reproduce the issue.
An ideal minimal reproduction (unless relevant):
next@canary
to make sure your issue has not already been fixedIn general, assume that we should not go through a lengthy onboarding process at your company code only to be able to verify an issue.
If you cannot create a clean reproduction, another way you can help the maintainers' job is to pinpoint the canary
version of next
that introduced the issue. Check out our releases, and try to find the first canary
release that introduced the issue. This will help us narrow down the scope of the issue, and possibly point to the PR/code change that introduced it. You can install a specific version of next
by running npm install next@<version>
.
Issues with the please simplify reproduction
label that receive no meaningful activity (e.g. new comments with a simplified reproduction link) are automatically closed and locked after 30 days.
If your issue has not been resolved in that time and it has been closed/locked, please open a new issue with the required reproduction.
Anyone experiencing the same issue is welcome to provide a minimal reproduction following the above steps.
We look into every Next.js issue and constantly monitor open issues for new comments.
However, sometimes we might miss one or two due to the popularity/high traffic of the repository. We apologize, and kindly ask you to refrain from tagging core maintainers, as that will usually not result in increased priority.
Providing a minimal reproduction from the start without asking helps us look into issues much more quickly, as we can easily verify if the reported bug is related to Next.js. That said, every issue is important to us, and if an issue gets closed by accident, we encourage you to open a new one linking to the old issue and we will look into it.
Hi @ztanner I've updated description. I've added new, clean repository and link to staging env of that repository and information about one thing I noticed in the network tab.
Thanks for updating it! I will take a look.
Link to the code that reproduces this issue
repository: https://github.com/PatrykWojcieszak/next-intercepting staging env: https://next-intercepting.vercel.app/
To Reproduce
intercepted route:
text should be displayedCurrent vs. Expected behavior
I expect the route to be intercepted on staging env as it is intercepted on local env.
Provide environment information
Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)
App Router
Which stage(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)
Vercel (Deployed)
Additional context
On my local machine it works fine for both development and production builds. I have noticed the following differences inside the url structure when inspecting the network tab: Local machine
Next-Url: /test/link4/children/link4/newLink4
Staging Environment
Next-Url: /test/%5Bdynamic%5D/children/%5Bdynamic%5D/newLink4