Open chris-olszewski opened 2 weeks ago
@techwithanirudh Can you list out the following:
If anyone could provide a repository that reproduces this behavior on their machine, I would be very thankful.
Issue:
Running turbo dev
works fine, but running turbo watch dev --continue
gives the following response:
@techwithanirudh Do the ANSI codes only appear along when there's a failed to connect to daemon
error?
@techwithanirudh If you could test out 2.2.4-canary.9
, I believe turbo watch
should do a better job of cleaning up the terminal regardless of why it exits.
@techwithanirudh Do the ANSI codes only appear along when there's a
failed to connect to daemon
error?
I think so, i'm gonna try testing the 2.2.4
Edit: Also happens with discovery failed: bad grpc status code:
similar to #8491
@techwithanirudh If you could test out
2.2.4-canary.9
, I believeturbo watch
should do a better job of cleaning up the terminal regardless of why it exits.
@chris-olszewski Yeah, it did a pretty good job of cleaning up the ANSI codes.
Thank you for testing it out! I'll try to find what's producing that final ANSI escape sequence
@chris-olszewski Is there any progress in resolving this issue, or perhaps some settings in Windows could help? However, in version 2.1.3, there was no such issue.
@kodermax I have still been unable to repro anything like this on my Windows machine. Searching online yields this link so that is the only guidance that I can give at the moment.
Verify canary release
Link to code that reproduces this issue
Need reproduction
What package manager are you using / does the bug impact?
pnpm
What operating system are you using?
Windows
Which canary version will you have in your reproduction?
2.2.3
Describe the Bug
Dev tasks are exiting prematurely with exit code
3221225786
withturbo
2.2.1 and above when using the TUIExpected Behavior
Dev tasks should not exit prematurely when using TUI
To Reproduce
See https://github.com/vercel/turborepo/issues/9304#issuecomment-2436218562
Additional context
https://github.com/vercel/turborepo/issues/9304#issuecomment-2432156979