Closed zhanjf closed 2 years ago
Changing to verilog-auto-inst-sort:t does change the order:
// Outputs
- .b (b),
.a (a),
+ .b (b),
// Inputs
Maybe you're using a older version or something?
I just git the file and make it, I think it's new one, right? Wsnyder Could you please try my example with //verilog-auto-inst-sort:nil?
nil doesn't do the sort, the differences between the two (nil vs t) are shown above.
So, what's wrong with my verilog-mode? I updated the verilog-mode.el. Can i add the verilog-mode version information in the verilog file?
See if "M-x load-file
Thanks for you help. I checked the version of emacs, it's really the old one . But very strange it cannot work even if I updated it.
You are using verilog-mode 2021-09-01-b6d4104-vpo-GNU
For new releases, see https://www.veripool.org/verilog-mode
For frequently asked questions, see https://www.veripool.org/verilog-mode-faq.html
To submit a bug, use M-x verilog-submit-bug-report
Hi, wsnyder, what's your emacs version? thanks!
Does "M-x describe-variable verilog-auto-inst-sort" show the right value?
Are you sure it's not working correctly - you get results different than I posted? (Versus what you personally think "sorted" might mean ;)
hi, I don't want to reorder the port list and try to use the verilog-auto-inst-sort.
and the result is
it seems verilog-auto-inst-sort does not work?