Open jodavies opened 6 years ago
This behaviour is described in section 3.11 of the FORM 3 paper:
SplitArg,((j1)),den; take all terms in j1 separately id den(j1) = den1(0,j1); a single term does not get split
OK, if this is somehow the desired behaviour I can make the same workaround.
Indeed, I use ((ep)) because it can appear with symbols, not just numbers.
Thanks, Josh.
Edit: Now that I think more about it, I have seen this construction a lot in summer, and have even used it myself in the past. Out of interest, in what situations is it desirable to have SplitArg
behave like it does?
Hello,
I am using
SplitArg ((ep)) f
to separate terms which do and do not containep
. This works fine apart from in one case:f(ep)
. Here it producesf(ep)
rather thanf(0,ep)
.An example:
prints
Thanks, Josh.