search

veromary / divinum-officium

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/divinum-officium
0 stars 0 forks source link

Collects sub unica conclusione #124

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
On feasts such as the Conversion of St. Paul (01-25) or Sts. Peter and Paul 
(06-29), or when there is any commemoration to be made under one conclusion, 
the word "Oremus" should not appear between the collects.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by canon.mi...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2012 at 8:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
LK dealt with this matter 
(http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php?topic=3368028.0), but his 
decision to include the "Oremus" must have been a misinterpretation of the 
rubric cited. I'll make the change.

Original comment by igregord on 26 Jan 2012 at 9:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
If it were only a question of R 249 (cited on Fisheaters), clearly one would 
say Oremus between the two prayers. However, there's also 110 a, which says 
that in the particular case of Sts. Peter and Paul, the two prayers coalesce 
into one to the point that they are counted as one. This would be why Oremus is 
not said here. I grant that there's some ambiguity about whether or not Oremus 
should be said, but if R 249 is considered decisive, we would have the weird 
situation of saying Oremus between the two in the breviary but not in the Mass.

In short, I agree that the change should be made.

Original comment by a...@liturgiaetmusica.com on 26 Jan 2012 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision r449.

Original comment by igregord on 29 Jan 2012 at 1:20