veromary / divinum-officium

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/divinum-officium
0 stars 0 forks source link

dagger added to an antiphon that shouldn't have one #92

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
http://divinumofficium.com/cgi-bin/horas/Pofficium.pl?command=prayMatutinum&date
1=8-16-2011&version=Rubrics%201960

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The antiphon of the 6th psalm (Psalmus 8) has a double dagger to indicate that 
one should skip the first verse of the psalm. This is incorrect. The first 
verse is a prefix of the antiphon, but the antiphon is much longer than the 
first verse. No dagger at all should appear in this case.

For reference, this is what the live site now produces (the positioning of the 
dagger will change when r304 gives live, but it will still be present):

Ant. Dómine Dóminus noster, * quam admirábile est nomen tuum in univérsa 
terra! quia glória et honóre coronásti Sanctum tuum, et constituísti eum 
super ópera mánuum tuárum
Psalmus 8 [6]
8:1 Dómine, Dóminus noster, * quam admirábile est nomen tuum in univérsa 
terra! ‡
8:2 Quóniam eleváta est magnificéntia tua, * super cælos.

Please provide any additional information below.
The problem is not limited to August 18. This antiphon and psalm are from the 
common of confessors (bishops and non-bishops), so it will also appear in other 
1st and 2nd class feasts that use the psalms and antiphons from the common 
(1960 rubrics).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by a...@liturgiaetmusica.com on 6 Dec 2011 at 9:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I should have said it's not limited to August 16th. Also, the fact that the 
problem is already present on the live site shows that it's independent of the 
changes in r296.

Original comment by a...@liturgiaetmusica.com on 6 Dec 2011 at 9:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
In other news, the English translation in this case ought to be adjusted to 
bring the antiphon and the psalm into agreement, if possible.

Original comment by a...@malton.name on 7 Dec 2011 at 11:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This issue was closed by revision r378.

Original comment by igregord on 3 Jan 2012 at 11:11