Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 11 Sep 2011 at 10:53
Errors from the image above mean that some ZP JS files wasn't loaded or jQuery
object was reloaded.
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 6:39
I did following:
1. Uploaded first image
2. Reloaded page by pressing F5
3. Uploaded second image
4. Clicked on Your photo shape and its editor opened without problems.
Tried to do same with shape editor - same result.
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 6:47
Are you saying you cannot replicate the problem?
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 9:10
Are you saying you cannot replicate the problem?
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 9:10
Yes, I can't. But maybe I was doing smth wrong?
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 11:39
Why are comments made by return of email not added to this???
1. This is a transient problem - ie external factors affect this.
2. I sent this screenshot because it was failing at the time. First image
upload attempt caused the errors as described. A refresh and the problem went
away. 24 hours later the page was working fine.
3. A page refresh will not magically load a js file if it failed the first
time, nor change the number of times the jq object is loaded. It may, however
affect the order in which actions are processed.
4. To quote from a previous email...
If there are multiple document.ready blocks ( which
there are ), and one of them creates an object that another block
modifies ( which it does ), and callbacks are relied upon ( which they
are ). then this may happen. as they all run asynchronously - and
external factors, such as the performance of a ZP server will affect.
This has never happened to me in ff or even ie on the few times I've
ever touched it. But it *DOES* regularly happen with chrome.
Original comment by steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 9:19
Anatoly, do we have a single entry point or are there multiple document.ready
in w2p?
Makes sense to check for dependencies first.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 12:51
> Anatoly, do we have a single entry point or are there multiple document.ready
in w2p?
>Makes sense to check for dependencies first.
There's only 2 document.ready in w2p. But they're independent
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 5:42
This site also uses fixed prices.
Original comment by steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 6:50
There is only one dependency between fixed qty and w2p as far as I can remember.
Fixed qty is checking for w2p presence to align the button.
I suspect we need to remove invalid HTML from fixed qty and the button will
stay where it should be.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 7:18
OK, I will check the code of FixedQty ext.
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 8:17
I can't replicate it.
Steve, can you still replicate it?
We have 2 document.ready, but the second one is completely independent from the
main one.
A bit at a loss. Not being able to replicate doesn't help.
The thing is - it did happen to me in FF at least once when I tried it first.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 16 Sep 2011 at 10:27
As we speak, it is not working properly. On firefox all is sweet, but to
display the in-preview editing, you either need to refresh the screen, or input
a field in the form to get it to display properly in chromium. Ronnie reports
the same problem in IE.
I attach a screenshot from chromium, with the javascript error console
displayed.
Original comment by steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 12:23
Attachments:
Anatoly, let's give it another good look.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 1:11
Atanas, can you replicate the problem?
I can't. It works for me every time.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 1:02
Anatoly, can we act on the info Steve provided or do we need to replicate it?
It does happen, no question about that.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 1:03
As discussed: let's insert pre-checks and disable functionality if some of the
resources are not loaded. Atanas, we still need it double-checked in case you
spot the errors.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 1:32
It was working perfectly, *UNTIL* I was talking with Ronnie and discussing
stuff on the site. It's not some kind of multi-user problem in the backend is
it??
Original comment by steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 9:29
... or because we have multiple browsers opening the same site on the same
client machine??
Original comment by steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 9:31
Nah, can;t be. There is no difference in available functionality. The content
may be different for different users, but it's the same set of JS files loading
up anyway.
We are inserting pre-checks checks.
The IE problem Ronnie reported wasn't a problem at all, unless I missed
something. It was about shapes being highlighted in IE on opening of the
editor, which may happen if the fields already have values.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 9:54
Diff: http://code.google.com/p/magento-w2p/source/detail?r=1798
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2011 at 7:24
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 22 Sep 2011 at 11:20
Please, try 1.9.2.0alpha2 release.
Original comment by Anatoly....@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2011 at 6:06
I'm not able to replicate this problem. I have encountered the bug before, as
part of other issues, but it's been a while since I've seen it.
No problems uploading images in Chrome using InPrev. I tried it on /mageimage/
web_to_print_store_incl_theme 1.9.2.0alpha2 (alpha)
The thing is, I tried to see the difference by testing on an older instance
(magedev) which is web_to_print_store_incl_theme 1.9.2.0alpha1.
We still have this customers' templates in there:
http://d1.zetaprints.com/magedev/index.php/political-candidates/postcard-12.html
Works fine for me or I'm missing something. Not flagging it as Test OK yet
because there might be some other provocation that I can try to replicate the
err on an old w2p ext version and then confirm that the same scenario doesn't
throw an err in latest alpha. Suggestions?
Original comment by agur...@gmail.com
on 26 Sep 2011 at 6:35
I guess we need to deploy it the customer's site and see if they still see it
happening.
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 26 Sep 2011 at 9:34
Original comment by ad...@zetaprints.com
on 3 Oct 2011 at 10:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
steve.ho...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2011 at 9:35Attachments: